Founder review queue for AI agents
RAAV routes agent-proposed product changes into a founder review queue. Inferred facts wait for sign-off before they enter the shared product record.
Agents discover product gaps while coding and often turn assumptions into implementation details. Without a review gate, guesses silently become shared truth.
When an agent wants to change product direction, RAAV creates a proposal instead of editing the handbook directly. The founder sees the exact wording, evidence, and affected work before confirming or sending it back.
The queue gives the founder one place to judge agent-proposed changes before they alter the product record.
When an agent finds a missing requirement or a better product behavior, that is valuable. But it should not automatically rewrite the shared plan.
RAAV routes those findings into proposals and memory candidates. The founder confirms what becomes truth and defers what belongs in a later release.
The review queue lets a non-coding founder judge product direction in plain language instead of reading diffs.
The founder sees the proposed wording and supporting evidence before deciding what the product record should say.
Each proposal links back to the agent run and affected work. The founder response is recorded with it.
Review is not a bottleneck; it is the founder's control surface.
RAAV does not replace your coding agent. It gives the agent a durable operating system for product truth, task ownership, and proof.
An agent finds a gap while implementing.
The finding becomes a proposal or memory candidate, not a silent edit.
The founder confirms, defers, rejects, or reopens.
The decision lands in the audit trail.
Ask your agent to route product findings through RAAV proposals so nothing durable is written without your sign-off.
Install RAAV in this repo and make agents propose product changes instead of writing them directly. Show me a review queue of proposals and memory candidates to confirm, defer, or reject.The coding agent can suggest a change, but only the founder response changes the accepted product record.
Most tools either write code or track human tickets. RAAV sits between the founder and the coding agents as shared product memory, coordination, and audit.
Founders ask how a review queue fits without slowing agents to a crawl.
Agents keep coding; only material product changes route through review. That small gate prevents guesses from becoming shared truth and reduces rework.
Agents propose tasks and requirement changes rather than writing product truth directly. The founder confirms, defers, rejects, or reopens.
No. RAAV is the memory and review layer around coding agents. It is zero-LLM by default.
The review queue is part of the Trial at €10/week. Solo and Team mainly change project limits, retention, and collaboration. Current access is through founder testing.